|
| Indians
Loosing in Gambling Business
|
Indians
losing in gambling business
Monday, September 4, 2000
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER STAFF
Indian gambling revenues have exploded
nationwide -- from $100 million in1988 to $8.26 billion a decade
later -- but most Native Americans have little to show for it.
Although some tribes have increased
reservation revenues and reduced unemployment, poverty continues
to plague many casino-operating tribes across the nation, an
Associated Press investigation has found.
From the Shoalwater Bay Casino in southwest Washington to the
Apache Gold Casino in San Carlos, Ariz., it's the same story: Most
casinos provide a few Indians with jobs, and that's about it.
Two-thirds of the Indian population belong to
tribes locked in poverty that still don't have Las Vegas-style
casinos. And of the 130 tribes with casinos, only a few near major
population centers have thrived. Most make just enough to cover
the bills, the AP analysis found.
Despite new gambling jobs, unemployment on
reservations with established casinos held steady around 54
percent between 1991 and 1997 as many of the casino jobs were
filled with non-Indians, according to information the
tribes reported to the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Before the Shoalwater Bay Casino opened in
1998, the tribe's unemployment rate was estimated at 66 percent,
said tribal chairman Herbert "Ike" Whitish. Today, about
40 percent of the tribal work force is still without work, he
said.
"The big success of a few tribes is
painting the picture that all tribes are extremely
successful," Whitish said. "The majority of those
(gambling) earnings are coming from about 5 percent of the casinos
in this country."
At Shoalwater Bay, where the Tokeland Peninsula separates Willapa
Bay from the Pacific, Whitish said "all revenue generated
from the casino is being used to pay back debt to investors."
It will be at least five years before income from the casino can
be used for programs for the more than 200
members of the tribe, he said.
"Contrary to the opinions of certain . . . politicians, this
tribe can say we are not getting rich off this casino and probably
never will," Whitish said. "But it provides jobs for
people who want to stay on the reservation and keep on working.
"If you want to look at the tribes in this state that are
successful with their casinos, it's tied directly to their
proximity to the I-5 corridor and major population centers."
The Lummi Tribe north of Bellingham learned the hard way about the
importance of location.
"We were the first casino to open and the first casino to
close its doors," said former tribal chairman Henry Cagey.
The casino was located several miles from I-5 on a remote road
fronting Puget Sound.
"The casino provided needed jobs and
just enough revenue to pay the debt of the casino, and that's
about it." It provided no money for tribal programs, he said.
But while the casino was operating, "the unemployment and
crime rates went down."
'No help' from casinos
In Arizona, the plaque outside Apache Gold Casino declares the $40
million hotel, golf and gambling resort has "helped enable
the San Carlos Apache Tribe to give a better quality of life to
its tribal members."
But seven years after the casino opened -- and four years after
the debut of a glittering new complex -- many Apache families
still crowd in small apartments or mobile homes.
The reservation's unemployment rate has climbed from 42 percent in
1991 to 58 percent in 1997, the latest year available. The number
of tribal members receiving welfare has jumped 20 percent. And the
tribal government still grants home sites without water and sewer
connections.
"We get no help from the casino, no money,
nothing," said Pauline Randall,75, a lifelong resident of San
Carlos.
Similar complaints echo across the 1.8 million-acre reservation in
eastern Arizona, but they could just as easily be heard on many
other Indian reservations across the country that have built
casinos in the past decade.
"Everybody thinks that tribes are getting rich from gaming,
and very few of them are," said Louise Benson, chairman of
the Hualapai Tribe in northwestern Arizona, one of two tribes with
casinos that failed during the 1990s.
For many of the tribes with Vegas-style casinos, gambling revenues
pay for casino operations and debt service, with little left to
upgrade the quality of life.
That's the case for the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe on the Olympic
Peninsula, said tribal chairman Ron Allen. Not long after the
casino opened in 1995 hoping to attract tourists visiting the
scenic splendor of the rain forest and Olympic Coast, the tribe
had to lay off about 300 of its 500 workers.
"What our casino had to do was make some dramatic adjustments
and downsize to meet the true market size," said Allen, who
is first vice president of the National Congress of American
Indians.
"Our business is turning around and is moving into the
black," he said. "All that means for us is that we have
the capacity to slowly begin paying off these huge debts."
It cost the tribe about $11 million to start the casino, and
paying that debt sucks up all the revenue. The annual gross
revenue is about $9 million, he said.
So far, the casino has never contributed to tribal programs or
services never returned direct payments to tribal members. The
only direct benefit is that about 40 members of the 495-person
tribe work there.
"The casino is providing a few jobs that provide minimal
income," Allen said. "It does not provide any meaningful
revenues to assist the tribe in its social and community
needs."
Of the 500,000 Indians whose tribes operate casinos, only
about 80,000 belong to tribes with gambling operations that
generate more than $100 million a year.
Some of the 23 tribes with the most successful casinos -- like the
Shakopee Mdewakanton Dakota Tribe in Minnesota -- pay each member
hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.
In Scott County, which includes the Shakopee reservation south of
Minneapolis, the unemployment rate plummeted from ; G f& |